Can Mr.Chidambaram Be Accused of Conflict of Interest?

Much is being said about Mr.Chidambram and his alleged help to one S.P.Gupta – a hotelier and a former client of Mr.Chidambaram when he was a practising lawyer.

P.C.Chidambaram

P.C.Chidambaram

While not going into the details of the allegations by BJP against Mr.Chidambaram, we think the issue involves two separate questions (and a few supplementary questions):

1. Did Mr.Chidambaram help or attempt to help Mr.Gupta? If he did, did he go out of the way to do that? Is it normal for the Home Minister to interfere in pending proceedings (at whatever stage) against any person? If Mr.Chidambaram did help Mr.Gupta, are there any valid, legal grounds for doing so?

2. Did Mr.Chidambaram’s alleged help to Mr.Gupta involve a conflict of interest?

We do not propose to answer the first set of questions here. But we do have a comment or two to make about the second.

With all due apologies to the vociferous leaders of the opposition parties, particularly the BJP with its nothing-to-write-home-about record in Karnataka, there is eminent sense in Mr.Chidambaram’s contention that Mr.Gupta is merely a former client and that no conflict of interest can be held against him (Mr.Chidambaram).

Mr.Gupta might be on familiar terms now with Mr.Chidambaram because of the former client-attorney relatonship; but that relationship itself is no longer current. Mr.Chidambaram is certainly not to be faulted for his understanding of the matter and we daresay the opposition parties are getting carried away by their perceptions. Yes, Mr.Chidambaram does know his law.

The opposition parties can very well probe and find out whether any favours have been extended to Mr.Gupta in relation to the criminal proceedings against him and whether the Home Minister can be blamed for any wrongdoing; but raising the bogey of ‘conflict of interest’ is pretty much ridiculous. Why don’t they think well before they speak out?

Parliament Building

Parliament Building

It is also time to examine whether the opposition parties are right in disrupting the proceedings of the Parliament over every matter – minor or major. There must be a better way of handling the various issues than blocking the proceedings of parliament over extended periods of time. There is a corresponding duty on the part of the Government and the ruling party to address the issues raised by the opposition parties. We hope both the ruling party and the opposition realise their respective responsibilities and ensure that they do not make a mockery of our constitution and our democratic institutions.

Disclaimer: The opinions expressed within this article are the personal opinions of the author. Spectralhues is not responsible for the accuracy, completeness, suitability, or validity of any information on this article. The information, facts or opinions expressed in the article do not reflect the views of Spectralhues and Spectralhues does not take any responsibility or liability for the same.

Sprightly Spirit

About Sprightly Spirit

“I dare do all that may become a man. Who dares more is none”. And all, may be. It may be the vigor. Or the spirit. Or the courage to avoid being “politically correct” or bent. And, ban all averse with immaculate overture of graciously fathomable words firm in views. Subtle. Justifying the undying conscience. Values. Knowledge. And, dares to stay true. True to own. True to the world. And, to the words. With a dream in eyes it exists. In you. In me. In all. The sprite that never shies away. The spirit that never dies!
Tags:

CONTACT US

We're not around right now. But you can send us an email and we'll get back to you, asap.

Sending

©2024 SpectralHues. Powered by SpectralHues. Designed by Vipul Madhani

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?